Now, three years down the line they're in deep, deep shit, because ofĬourse they have now become the de-facto maintainer of something like (like the mpm_worker you see in apache2 but more advanced) but theįact that they haven't submitted the patches upstream speaks volumes. That the freeswitch team created an entirely new type of server type Libapr (apache runtime)! i mean, don't get me wrong, it's fantastic including openssl (patched), libspeex (patched), and even Patching them because they had bugs and missing features at the time,Īnd effectively they ended up forking virtually every single dependent They made the severe, severe mistake of pulling in *every* dependency, Nightmare scenario of how not to fork a project (freeswitch is a fork look at what happened with the freeswitch team, for an absolute Various different packages, putting in bugfixes and adding in newįeatures, but there are ways to do that and there are ways *not* to do I'm keenly aware that you need to accelerate development somewhat of Up-to-date, but that would be something i'd be prepared to do. Responsibility to keep that already-checked-out copy of webkit Getting webkit from, please get it fromįile:/opt/src/webkit/" and bitbake would then apply google's patches if you usedīitbake, i could drop in an "override" file which said "instead of
UC BROWSER FOR UBUNTU DOWNLOAD
Have to download multiple copies of the source code.Įxample: i already have a copy of webkit on my system.
It's also designed to allow you to do "patches" in many many differentįorms to source packages which again can be obtained from many manyĭifference sources, which means that you don't have to force people to Tools that are required, from source code. it's designed to download all - and importantly *only* - the that's just an absolutely awesome and amazing Native gcc compiler, autoconf and other tools etc. Win32/64 builds (even doing cross-compiles "natively" by running the Perform cross-compiles such as using mingw so you could use it to do there is :) you could use bitbake, which is designed to Sorry, but there's not really anything we can do about > Yes, the Chromium source is very very large, and this can be This is unlikely to make any difference to your ability to use > and running so that i can do even a single simple LAN test between twoīased on branch 1229 currently, which was created from trunk two daysĪgo, so compared to the Windows/Mac canaries it is only two daysīehind. > i'm going to have to try running chrome under Wine (!) to get 2 computers up one's running debian amd64 gnu/linux, the other MacOSX. > what i *actually* wanted to do was to start developing early for WebRTC. > 1gbyte svn repository: that's acceptable. > goodness sake! that's absolutely insane! webkit i know is a about a > up-to-date, and makes the resources far too burdensome. > testing this build out because google cannot be bothered to keep it > that and another build error means that i am not going to assist google by i'm going to have to try running chrome under Wine (!) to get 2 computers up and running so that i can do even a single simple LAN test between two machines.Ĭome on guys, you can do better than this. What i *actually* wanted to do was to start developing early for WebRTC. 10 gigabytes for goodness sake! that's absolutely insane! webkit i know is a about a 1gbyte svn repository: that's acceptable.
That and another build error means that i am not going to assist google by testing this build out because google cannot be bothered to keep it up-to-date, and makes the resources far too burdensome. running "make" in the tools directory started pulling in *another* 1gbyte from a git repository to make nacl: that's just too much. i'd done a 1.3gbyte download (it took 16 hours), which expands out to 9gb and includes a large number of DLLs and EXEs as well as containing 3gbyte of duplicated "third party" source code. i've just tried: nacl is entirely missing.
UC BROWSER FOR UBUNTU CODE
what that means is that the code doesn't get built, and as a result, it gets broken. so, what you're saying is that google doesn't do any gnu/linux builds.